today's seminars were on finances (credit reports, analysis of budgets, and other systems), and personality types.
i'm having a hard time digesting this analysis procedure. it seems as if much of this is seriously conflicting with the stereotypical models we were talking about earlier. i think these theories are too narrow; there are too many possibilities out there, and so i don't feel the spectrum here is broad enough.
i'm listening, but i don't understand the function here. the order of these sessions is challenging me in terms of logic. ticara brought up astrological signs, and to me (and most people, it seemed)that made sense. astrological signs are related to the season in which they fall, and can affect the circumstances of one's life that way. summer babies, spring babies, fall babies, winter babies. we have experiences and are brought up under the auspicious events coinciding with the seasons of our birth, and therefore our signs.
i actually admit this is the first session i haven't enjoyed so far; tomorrow i may have a mental evolution and change my mind completely. i am seeing myself grow but at the same time, recess so quickly, swinging back and forth with little discretion or bias.
No comments:
Post a Comment